swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2941 discussions

CableCom Contact Address
by Martin Blapp 23 Mar '05

23 Mar '05

Hi, A customer of ours has found his server blacklisted. He tried everything, mailing to abuse(a)highspeed.ch etc, he called the hotline. As usual, cablecom is not very responsable. Has someone a contact adresse (phone etc.) for me so I can solve this issue ? Please contact me off-list. Martin Martin Blapp, <mb(a)imp.ch> <mbr(a)FreeBSD.org> ------------------------------------------------------------------ ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP: <finger -l mbr(a)freebsd.org> PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E ------------------------------------------------------------------

3 3

Rejecting unknown/misconfigured mailclients
by Tobias Glasow 21 Mar '05

21 Mar '05

Hi all, Can some of you tell, how you deal with mailservers sending mail to your servers, which have not/incorrect configured dns informations? Postfix rejects mail with "reject_unknown_client", even when a ptr record exist, but forward and reverse lookup are not identical. In our logs we see this misconfiguration happen very often. When I activate blocking these clients, the reject rate nearly doubles. Just want to know, how you deal with this. Do you reject mail from clients with misconfigured dns or do you tolerate it? Regards and have a nice weekend. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Tobias Glasow ------------------------------------ Magnet.ch AG Güterstrasse 86 4053 Basel Tel.: 0842 420 420 Fax.: 0842 420 422 E-Mail: t.glasow(a)magnet.ch ----------------------------------- Ihr unabhängiger Internetprovider -----------------------------------

4 3

Sendmail patch for non RFC conform DNS answers from bluewin
by Martin Blapp 18 Mar '05

18 Mar '05

Hi all, The recent bluewin migration to new dns load-balancers broke sendmail on BSD systems. It seems that the BSD resolver (not relevant if one uses bind8 or bind9) is different than the one in linux. I suspect that all BSD systems have this problem, including MacOSX. The following sendmail patch does work around this problem. It is not 100% correct but does work for now. --- sendmail/daemon.c.orig Thu Mar 17 10:15:11 2005 +++ sendmail/daemon.c Thu Mar 17 10:12:34 2005 @@ -2256,7 +2256,7 @@ /* check for name server timeouts */ # if NETINET6 if (WorkAroundBrokenAAAA && family == AF_INET6 && - errno == ETIMEDOUT) + (errno == ETIMEDOUT || h_errno == TRY_AGAIN)) { and of course you'll need this option in your MC File: define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl Martin Martin Blapp, <mb(a)imp.ch> <mbr(a)FreeBSD.org> ------------------------------------------------------------------ ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP: <finger -l mbr(a)freebsd.org> PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E ------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'a allaboutswisscom dumping)
by Martin Ebnöther 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

> -----Original Message----- > The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked > did pay too much as well. =:-) Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load completely. =:-/ Well anyway, I mean these lines: "Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt." CU, Venty

9 8

RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallab outswisscom dumping)
by Kuster, Christian 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Sounds like Bablefish ;-) -----Original Message----- From: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]On Behalf Of Guazzoni Daniele, CH Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2005 11:17 To: swinog(a)swinog.ch Subject: RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallab outswisscom dumping) Maybe I worked until late yesterday, maybe the coffe this mornig was'nt strong enough... I tried 5 times to read this mail and I still can't get any logical sentence out of it. If someone of you could translate the mail of Xaver maybe... Daniele -----Original Message----- From: Xaver Aerni [mailto:xaerni@pop.ch] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 10:41 To: swinog(a)swinog.ch Subject: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping) I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem... -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]Im Auftrag von Martin Ebnöther Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2005 09:16 An: swinog(a)swinog.ch Betreff: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping) > -----Original Message----- > The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked > did pay too much as well. =:-) Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load completely. =:-/ Well anyway, I mean these lines: "Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt." CU, Venty _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

2 1

RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallab outswisscom dumping)
by Guazzoni Daniele, CH 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Maybe I worked until late yesterday, maybe the coffe this mornig was'nt strong enough... I tried 5 times to read this mail and I still can't get any logical sentence out of it. If someone of you could translate the mail of Xaver maybe... Daniele -----Original Message----- From: Xaver Aerni [mailto:xaerni@pop.ch] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 10:41 To: swinog(a)swinog.ch Subject: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping) I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay. Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far... If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached image" and with the sender is allways "kopierer@...." That becomes merry with looking for...:-D) But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem... -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: swinog-bounces(a)lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch]Im Auftrag von Martin Ebnöther Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2005 09:16 An: swinog(a)swinog.ch Betreff: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping) > -----Original Message----- > The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked > did pay too much as well. =:-) Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load completely. =:-/ Well anyway, I mean these lines: "Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandalträchtige E-Mail in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgründen haben diese das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt." CU, Venty _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.

1 0

Call for presentations // SwiNOG-10
by Michel Renfer 14 Mar '05

14 Mar '05

Hya all! We're very happy, that Cablecom will act as sponsor for SwiNOG-10. Now, guys, we will have to fill up the agenda! Feedback, suggestions and offerings are now requirend and welcome! Please send them either to the core-team (swinog-core(a)swinog.ch) or directly to me. thx & c ya, michel

1 0

SwiNOG 10 Sponsors
by Pascal Gloor 14 Mar '05

14 Mar '05

Finally we found them !!! :-) Cablecom will be the main sponsor of the event. T-Systems will sponsor the beer^H^H^H^Hsocial event. TheNet will sponsor the Wireless Internet access. More news about SwiNOG 10 soon.... If you have not yet registered, hurry up !! http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/registration.asp Pascal

1 0

Bluewin Server auf SpamCOP und Spamhaus
by Marcel Stutz 14 Mar '05

14 Mar '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Wer kann mir bei Bluewin helfe, dass sie von der SpamCop und Spamhaus Liste kommen ? Bluewin Kunden werden vom Bluewin Support falsch Informiert oder angelogen, das Bluewin keine Probleme hat mit Spam und das in unserem Fall Genotec der übeltäter ist. Wenn aber ein Mail solche Informationen enthalten sollte der Bluewin Support etwas besser Informieren können vorallem wenn das seid einer Woche der Fall ist siehe SwiNOG Post. SpamCop Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.61] blocked using bl.spamcop.net, reason: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.186.18.61 Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.62] blocked using bl.spamcop.net, reason: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.186.18.62 Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.63] blocked using bl.spamcop.net, reason: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.186.18.63 Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.64] blocked using bl.spamcop.net, reason: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.186.18.64 Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.65] blocked using bl.spamcop.net, reason: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.186.18.65 Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.66] blocked using bl.spamcop.net, reason: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.186.18.66 Spamhaus Remote MTA smtp.genotec.ch: SMTP diagnostic: 554 Service unavailable; [195.186.18.64] blocked using sbl.spamhaus.org, reason: http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL23877 Anwort die ein User von uns durch ihren Bluewin Support erhalten hat. Hier die Antwort von Bluewin zur Infformation: +++++++++ Lösung: Die Meldung "We do not relay" oder "Serverfehler 554" erscheint, wenn Sie den Bluewin-Mailserver als Relay (Transit) benützen, d.h., Sie haben sich nicht über Bluewin eingewählt. Die SMTP-Maileinstellung (ausgehender Mailserver) lautet aber auf "mail.bluewin.ch" und Sie senden Mails an eine Nicht-Bluewin-Adresse (xxxx(a)yyyy.zz statt xxxx(a)bluewin.ch). Dieses Vorgehen wird "Relaying" genannt und wird von Bluewin nicht unterstützt. (Dies nicht zuletzt aus dem Grund, dass wir unsere Kunden vor unerwünschten Massenmails oder "Spam" schützen möchten.) Um E-Mails versenden zu können, muss die SMTP-Maileinstellung dem jeweiligen Provider angepasst werden, d.h. Sie müssen den Postausgangsserver Ihres Providers eintragen. ++++++++++ Mit freundlichen Grüssen Marcel Stutz Netzwerk & Unix Administrator - ------------------------------------------------------------------ | Genotec Internet Consulting AG | E-Mail : marcel.stutz(a)genotec.ch Hegenheimermattweg 119a | Website : http://www.genotec.ch CH - 4123 Allschwil | -------------------------------- Schweiz | | Zentrale: +41 61 487 99 99 - ------------------------------- | Fax : +41 61 487 99 98 | Support : 0848 321 123 easy[hosting] | 500 MB, unl.Pointings, | -------------------------------- Subdomains und E-mails, | Supportanfragen bitte immer an Internetzugang und mehr | support(a)genotec.ch SFr. 150/Jahr | Web: http://support.genotec.ch | - ------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQhQ/WG67Rst+AWkCEQJL6QCcDDSPqOSKBzp9SXlUhdhnAIOJMBIAoL/I DsjWLARpwRufbVAvFwUT09IE =AJDa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

13 18

RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'a all aboutswisscom dumping)
by Martin Ebnöther 14 Mar '05

14 Mar '05

> -----Original Message----- > Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Hallo. > Sonntagszeitung claims yesterday that WEKO is investigation against > Swisscom because of the Migros contract. > http://www.sonntagszeitung.ch/dyn/news/wirtschaft/477677.html The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked did pay too much as well. =:-) CU, Venty

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog