swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2933 discussions

colozuri
by Silvan Gebhardt 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Can someone from colozuri contact me offlist please? Thank you Silvan +41788103988 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAFhHIACgkQC82WwYR1u2pv4ACeJqmnJcxA5JT/Wzd9W4RWBMWo DpYAn0c+Fl8XESw8UtIHnB6Y7GZ2/m4I =K3lU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

'Foreign' IP Addresses assigned to swiss customers?
by Benoit Panizzon 08 Jul '12

08 Jul '12

Hya Lately we have received a increased numbers of requests from customer employed by some banks and working in homeoffice a home office via remote access to their bank, asking us to confirm that we only assign 'swiss' IP addresses to our customers. Well I usualy replied to those customers, that they can check the status of their IP address at RIPE and check to which country their allocation or assignment is registered. Apparently this is not enough. FINMA has made it a requirement, that if some bank employee wants to work from home, they need a written confirmation from their ISP that this ISP is not assigning IP addresses to customers outside switzerland and that the IP address the customer is using is operated in switzerland and cannot be used from abroad or assigned to customers outside switzerland. I got in contact with one of those bank's security department to explain to them, that of course we correctly register our IP ranges at RIPE and that no, we cannot guarantee that our customers do not operate VPN or Proxies etc, which would make it possible to use IP addresses from abroad. And of course we have business customers with branch offices all over the world which could be using their IP Range to route part of it outside switzerland to such an office. I wanted to know why the information about ranges as registered @ RIPE are not good enough for the FINMA and how we could positively answer the question that we do not assign IP addresses to devices outside switzerland. I was told, that there apparently are plenty of ISP in Switzerland, which assign 'foreign' IP addresses to their customers and that there are also switzerland based ISP which use their 'swiss' IP allocations to provide internet access to customers located outside switzerland, which causes legal problems if such an IP is used to access servers run under FINMA policies. This is why FINMA requests that an ISP confirms that he uses his IP addresses exclusively for CPE located in switzerland. they Hmm, I wonder.. which ISP do operate IP address ranges in switzerland which are registered at RIPE to some other entity not located in switzerland? Which Swiss ISP do offer services outside Switzerland using IP Ranges that are registered @ RIPE with Country: CH? Or have I found a 'papiertiger' policy written by someone with no clue how IP assignment by RIPE works? Mit freundlichen Grüssen Benoit Panizzon -- I m p r o W a r e A G - ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 02 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

3 2

*SPECIAL* SwiNOG-BE111 - Beer Event 111 - 2nd of July 2012 @ Angelsfood Lounge / ZH
by Steven Glogger 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

hi everybody i'm pleased to announce together with Nicole the SwiNOG-BE111 @ the Angelsfood lounge - we will put the fire on and create a wonderful barbequeue for you! the deal is: CHF 40.- is fixed for all the food and drinks are paid separately. Nicole will heat up her wonderful smokers BBQ gril :) here's the announcement for the next beer event: the facts for the next event: ----------------------------- Date: 2nd of July 2012 Time: starting around 18.30 o'clock Location: @ the "angelfood: creative cuisine" (Forchstrasse 424, 8702 Zollikon; Tram 11 or Forchbahn until Rehalp) http://www.angelsfood.ch Registration deadline: 01.07.2012 00:00:00 Registration URL: http://swinog.mrmouse.ch/ ----------------------------- since we have to make reservations, i need to know who's coming and who not. If you cannot attend and you're registered please inform me asap (+41 79 277 92 35). greetings -steven & nicole

2 2

Fwd: [MBONED] PIM survey for operators
by Thomas Kernen 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

FYI. May be of interest to some of the operators in Switzerland. Regards, Thomas -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [MBONED] PIM survey for operators Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:39:58 -1000 (HST) Resent-From: Antonio Querubin <tony(a)lavanauts.org> Resent-To: nanog(a)nanog.org Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:21:41 -0700 From: Stig Venaas <stig(a)venaas.com> To: MBONED WG <mboned(a)ietf.org> The IETF pim working group is conducting a survey in order to advance the PIM Sparse Mode spec on the IETF Standards Track, and would like input from operators. The survey ends July 20th. Please see below for more information. thank you, pim chairs Mike & Stig Introduction: PIM-SM was first published as RFC 2117 in 1997 and then again as RFC 2362 in 1998. The protocol was classified as Experimental in both of these documents. The PIM-SM protocol specification was then rewritten in whole and advanced to Proposed Standard as RFC 4601 in 2006. Considering the multiple independent implementations developed and the successful operational experience gained, the IETF has decided to advance the PIM-SM routing protocol to Draft Standard. This survey intends to provide supporting documentation to advance the Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) routing protocol from IETF Proposed Standard to Draft Standard. (Due to RFC 6410, now the intention is to progress it to Internet Standard. Draft Standard is no longer used.) This survey is issued on behalf of the IETF PIM Working Group. The responses will be collected by a neutral third-party and kept strictly confidential; only the final combined results will be published. Marshall Eubanks has agreed to anonymize the response to this Questionnaire. Marshall has a long experience with Multicast but has no direct financial interest in this matter, nor ties to any of the vendors involved. He is also a member of the IAOC, Chair of the IETF Trust and co-chair of the IETF Layer 3 VPN Working Group. Please send Questionnaire responses to his email address, marshall.eubanks(a)gmail.com. He requests that such responses include the string "RFC 4601 bis Questionnaire" in the subject field. Before answering the questions, please comple the following background information. Name of the Respondent: Affliation/Organization: Contact Email: Provide description of PIM deployment: Do you wish to keep the information provided confidential: Questions: 1 Have you deployed PIM-SM in your network? 2 How long have you had PIM-SM deployed in your network? Do you know if your deployment is based on the most recent RFC4601? 3 Have you deployed PIM-SM for IPv6 in your network? 4 Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor) PIM-SM implementations for your deployment? 5 Have you encountered any inter-operability or backward- compatibility issues amongst differing implementations? If yes, what are your concerns about these issues? 6 Have you deployed both dense mode and sparse mode in your network? If yes, do you route between these modes using features such as *,*,RP or PMBR? 7 To what extent have you deployed PIM functionality, like BSR, SSM, and Explicit Tracking? 8 Which RP mapping mechanism do you use: Static, AutoRP, or BSR? 9 How many RPs have you deployed in your network? 10 If you use Anycast-RP, is it Anycast-RP using MSDP (RFC 3446) or Anycast-RP using PIM (RFC 4610)? 11 Do you have any other comments on PIM-SM deployment in your network? _______________________________________________ MBONED mailing list MBONED(a)ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

1 0

open VoIP technology workshop
by Stanislav Sinyagin 20 Jun '12

20 Jun '12

hi, I'm organizing an open, English-spoken, workshop on the topics of VoIP service redundancy: htto://trrtrr.net If you're interested to join, please vote in Doodle: http://doodle.com/gvmswcx5nridzidf cheers, stan

1 1

Re: [swinog] Reverse zone lookup issues
by Daniel Rechsteiner 14 Jun '12

14 Jun '12

> Does anyone still experiencing problems with this RIPE issue? > https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/service-announcements/reverse-dns-service… Yes, we do. I hope RIPE fixes that asap. PTR records are quite important for SMTP servers. Daniel

1 0

Reverse zone lookup issues
by Adrian Kägi 14 Jun '12

14 Jun '12

Hi list Does anyone still experiencing problems with this RIPE issue? https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/service-announcements/reverse-dns-service… Or some known issues yesterday? Regards Adrian

1 0

Verkauf von Blade Server, 48v Netzteile, DLAMs
by Verkauf 11 Jun '12

11 Jun '12

Sehr geehrte Swinog-Community Wir bieten folgende Hardware zum Kauf an: HP Blade: - 2x Cisco GESM HP Blade System - 3x HP BL20p G3 - 2x HP BL25p - 2x HP BL20p G 48V power supply - SP-320-48 48V power supply - SP-320-48 ZyXEL DLSAM: IES-2000: - MSC1000A - SLC1224-22 (shdsl line card) ZyXEL DLSAM: IES-2000: - MSC1000A - SLC1224-22 (shdsl line card) - ALC1224-71 (adsl line card) Bilder werden gerne auf anfrage zugestellt. Bei Interesse melden Sie sich bitte per Mail an folgende Adresse: verkauf(a)gmail.li Freundliche Grüsse

1 0

Gerty vs. Rancid
by Tobias Brunner 11 Jun '12

11 Jun '12

Hi list Is anyone of you using Gerty (https://github.com/ssinyagin/gerty) instead of Rancid for doing network gear config backup? If yes, is it worth a try? And for doing mass-config-updates on many switches, is it also usable? Thanks for every input =) Cheers, Tobias -- Nine Internet Solutions AG, Albisriederstr. 243a, CH-8047 Zuerich Support +41 44 637 40 40 | Tel +41 44 637 40 00 | Direct +41 44 637 40 13 Skype nine.ch_support

2 1

hosting for 1 powersupply with lan port
by Silvan M. Gebhardt 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

Hi Swinogers, I'm currently thinking about deploying a Sheevaplug or similar with mosh (http://mosh.mit.edu) as a login jumphost since I am several hours in mobile mode every day and I need a space outside of my network to host a *jump host* please contact me offlist and offer me housing for something like that: http://www.plugcomputer.eu/ All I am taking up is some bandwith (expected bandwith in average probably 1mbit max, half of it for keepalives for outbound vpn tunnels, Power consumption apparently less than 10watts. Need v6 and v4 connection, 1 IP each, public, not firewalled, 1 Plug in the power strip Since this is a rather non-standard thing I'm looking for, but I need it in a datacenter outside my infrastructure, I thought it's best to ask here. Btw, for anyone experienced already or looking into mosh, looking forward for exchange here Good Evening! Silvan

12 21

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog