well, that is not even required - only a lookalike with some "Zöpfen" could be sufficient
Am 15.01.2009 um 20:34 schrieb roger@mgz.ch:
maybe some hacker getting hired to locate a child-porn pic on the first page of some unwanted politician. that would be then a reason for filtering this page.
slowly the internet starts to get unusable ... and be the playground of some organisation and government.
Roger
I know that it is futile. there it's about the "Prinzip" - I hate to have to use some anonymizer to use archive.org (where I did download some stuff in the past years, as they don't only host "websites" In this regard, I still trust my ISP not to put one of these boxes in use any time.... I mean, there is not only "child p..." anymore, we begin to see the collateral damage, on wikipedia or now this try, I remember reading about germany asking to block online gambling sites next - what comes next?? Perhabs the hacker tool sites get blocked in germany? silvan Am 15.01.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Jeroen Massar:
Silvan Gebhardt wrote: Hi I just read about the blocking of archive.org (which is for me an ususal site(!) ( http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Britische-Jugendschuetzer-lassen-Internet-Arc... blockieren--/meldung/121754 ) is one source, which refers to http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/iwf_details_archive_blacklisting/ Do We have to expect that the ISP using the white clean box do block archive.org soon (and as the article states, probably completely?)
Guess Google Cache will be next th
swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog