swinog

swinog@lists.swinog.ch

2927 discussions

SMS provider
by Rebert Luc 09 Jul '10

09 Jul '10

Dear SWINOG Users, I need a SMSC Gateway provider which can communicate with SMPP protocol for example. Thanks Best regards Niklas Le mer 30/06/10 08:39, "Kummer, Thomas" THOMAS.KUMMER(a)T-SYSTEMS.CH a écrit: Hi Niklas What exactly do you want to have? What sort of service do you want to run on the SMSC? I might be of help, depending on what you are looking for. Best regards Thomas Thomas Kummer T-Systems Schweiz AG International Carrier Sales ">http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog [8] Links: ------ [1] mailto:thomas.kummer@t-systems.ch [2] http://www.deutschetelekom.com%2Ficss%2Fswitzerland [3] mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch [4] mailto:swinog-bounces@lists.swinog.ch [5] mailto:lists@rebert.name [6] mailto:swinog@lists.swinog.ch [7] mailto:swinog@lists.swinog.ch [8] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

3 3

Looking for Cisco ATA flash cards
by Michel Renfer 01 Jul '10

01 Jul '10

Hi All! I'm looking for 1 or 2 cisco ATA flash card (the old ones for the 72xx I/O controller boards) with a least 128M capacitiy. Anyone has some of them to sell/ for beer/ ... ? cheers, michel

1 0

SMS provider
by lists＠rebert.name 30 Jun '10

30 Jun '10

Dear SWINOG users, I am looking for a SMSC.. Does anybody has an experience with one of them ? Thank you for your feedback. Niklas

5 5

Huge delays in 1.4.e164.arpa NAPTR lookups?
by Benoit Panizzon 25 Jun '10

25 Jun '10

Hi out there The last few days I noticed quite a large delay when I first dial a number from my asterisk server. I found that the problem is that the 1.4.e164.arpa lookup takes enormous time to return a NXDOMAIN == ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.arpa', options='', record=1 == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 9.0.3.9.6.2.8.1.6.1.4.e164.arpa, 5148 ms compared to the e164.org or e164.info lookups: == ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.org', options='', record=1 == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 9.0.3.9.6.2.8.1.6.1.4.e164.org, 141 ms == ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.info', options='', record=1 == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 9.0.3.9.6.2.8.1.6.1.4.e164.info, 167 ms Of course, as soon as the NXDOMAIN is in the local DNS cache, dialing the same number is fast again. Also the previously working ETHZ e164.arpa test-tone number cannot be resolved anymore: == ast_get_enum(num='+41446580004', tech='sip', suffix='e164.arpa', options='', record=1 == ast_get_enum() profiling: FAIL, 4.0.0.0.8.5.6.4.4.1.4.e164.arpa, 5150 ms Has switch ceased to offer e164.arpa entries? 1.4.e164.arpa does not seem to be delegated anymore: ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R1 <<>> NS 1.4.e164.arpa. ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 49396 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;1.4.e164.arpa. IN NS ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: e164.arpa. 10784 IN SOA ns-pri.ripe.net. e164-contacts.ripe.net. 2010062458 14400 3600 2419200 14400 Deleagions found by dnsbajaj: Subdomains: 0.1.8.7.8.e164.arpa , 0.2.4.e164.arpa , 0.3.e164.arpa , 0.4.e164.arpa , 0.6.e164.arpa , 0.7.3.e164.arpa , 0.8.3.e164.arpa , 0.9.2.e164.arpa , 0.9.5.e164.arpa , 1.2.4.e164.arpa , 1.3.e164.arpa , 1.6.e164.arpa , 1.7.9.e164.arpa , 1.8.e164.arpa , 2.6.2.e164.arpa , 2.6.9.e164.arpa , 2.6.e164.arpa , 2.8.e164.arpa , 3.2.4.e164.arpa , 3.3.e164.arpa , 3.4.e164.arpa , 3.5.3.e164.arpa , 3.6.e164.arpa , 4.3.2.8.8.e164.arpa , 4.4.e164.arpa , 4.5.3.e164.arpa , 4.7.3.e164.arpa , 4.8.e164.arpa , 4.9.5.e164.arpa , 5.5.2.e164.arpa , 5.5.e164.arpa , 5.6.e164.arpa , 6.3.e164.arpa , 6.4.2.e164.arpa , 6.4.e164.arpa , 6.6.e164.arpa , 6.8.3.e164.arpa , 6.8.8.e164.arpa , 6.8.e164.arpa , 6.9.5.e164.arpa , 7.4.2.e164.arpa , 7.4.e164.arpa , 8.0.5.e164.arpa , 8.4.e164.arpa , 8.5.3.e164.arpa , 9.3.e164.arpa , 9.4.e164.arpa , 9.5.3.e164.arpa -Benoît-

2 1

SwiNOG-BE87 - Beer Event 87 - 12th of July 2010 @ Pumpstation / ZH
by Steven Glogger 24 Jun '10

24 Jun '10

hi everybody here's the announcement for the next beer event. i hope weather will be good, if not we have to go to the outback lodge. please check the WEBSITE until 12:00 on the event-day to be sure about the place. the facts for the next event: ----------------------------- Date: 12th of July 2010 Time: starting around 18.30 o'clock Location: @lake in restaurant "Pumpstation" (see image; www.pumpstation.ch) backup location if bad weather: Outback Lodge. Registration deadline: 10.07.2010 12:00:00 ----------------------------- Please register here: http://swinog.mrmouse.ch/ since we have to make reservations, i need to know who's coming and who not. If you cannot attend and you're registered please inform me asap (+41 79 277 92 35). -steven

1 0

IronPort E-Mail Reputation
by Patrick Studer 24 Jun '10

24 Jun '10

Hi Some day ago, a account of our mail server has been misused to sent out some thousand of spam mails. This could happen, because the spammer which misused the account logged in from different IPs (botnet?) over the whole world. Every time, he successfully (smtp) authenticated, he sent out a couple of mails (about 20-30). Then he disconnected and reconnected after 1-2 minutes from an other IP and sent again some 20-30 mails. This has been done for some hours, which generated some thousand of SPAM mails. Since this started Friday night and was just discovered yesterday, we was listed on one blacklist. We changed the password of the misused account and removed our server from this blacklist. We already was happy, that it's just was that simple, but we was to fast. We got then complains, that some mail system still block our mail server. After some investigation, we found out, that this mail system or mail gateways are base on Cisco IronPort. First at all, this system didn't response with a clear response (Something like 5.7.1 Your access to submit messages to this e-mail system has been rejected, isn't really helpful for an mail admin to find out why his email get blocked.) After we found out, that all this boxes are Ironport Boxes, we was pointed to the www.senderbase.org. But this site isn't very helpful. You can find out that your mail server has a bad email reputation, but that's it. A link to SpamCop on the webpage isn't helpful either, since we aren’t listed in their blacklist. The only e-mail address on the webpage seem not to be the contact for when you have a bad e-mail reputation. We thought, perhaps the Score will fall down over 24 hours, but that's not the case. So, we tried to get some help from the cisco ironport support. There answer wasn't very helpful either. They told us, that senderbase.org is a complete other company and they don't have any contact and we should try their website www.senderbase.org. Otherwise, if we don't have a IronPort box, they will not help us. Now, the question is, what can we do, do get our mails delivered to this ironport boxes? We really take care, to do all against be used for spamming or to be known as a good source for mails (spf, dkim, smtp-auth, tarpiting, etc.etc.). We think, that this reputation system isn't that great. We have one issue and get blocked for several days (or weeks) without an option to take care about the situation. Any help or suggestion would be appreciated! Kind Regards Patrick Studer ****************************************************************************** X-NetConsulting GmbH Internet http://www.x-netconsulting.ch Grosspeterstrasse 21 E-Mail p.studer(a)x-netconsulting.ch CH-4052 Basel Telefon +41 61 315 85 55 Schweiz Fax +41 61 315 85 59 ******************************************************************************

7 9

Net neutrality
by Xaver Aerni 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

Verry intresting, in US http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/usa-umstrittenes-internetgesetz-obama-un…

2 1

Root Zone DNSSEC Deployment Technical Status Update
by Joe Abley 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

Root Zone DNSSEC Deployment Technical Status Update 2010-06-18 This is the ninth of a series of technical status updates intended to inform a technical audience on progress in signing the root zone of the DNS. RESOURCES Details of the project, including documentation published to date, can be found at <http://www.root-dnssec.org/>. We'd like to hear from you. If you have feedback for us, please send it to rootsign(a)icann.org. KSK CEREMONY 1 COMPLETE The first KSK ceremony for the root zone was completed this week in Culpeper, VA, USA. The Ceremony Administrator was Mehmet Akcin. The first production KSK has now been generated. This is the key that is scheduled to be put into service on 2010-07-15. The first production Key Signing Request (KSR) generated by VeriSign has now been processed by ICANN using the root zone KSK, and the resulting Signed Key Response (KSR) has been accepted by VeriSign. This SKR contains signatures for Q3 2010, for use between 2010-07-01 and 2010-09-30. Audit materials relating to the first ceremony will be published as soon as is practical, and in particular before 2010-07-15. The KSK and SKR generated during this ceremony will not be approved for production until the KSK key pair has been successfully transported to ICANN's west-coast ceremony facility in El Segundo, CA, USA, and placed in secure storage. KSK CEREMONY 2 SCHEDULED The second KSK ceremony for the root zone is scheduled to take place in El Segundo, CA, USA on 2010-07-12. Replication of key materials onto west-coast HSMs, enrolment of west-coast crypto officers and processing of the Q4 2010 KSR (for production use between 2010-10-01 and 2010-12-31) will take place during this ceremony. PLANNED DEPLOYMENT SCHEDULE Already completed: 2010-01-27: L starts to serve DURZ 2010-02-10: A starts to serve DURZ 2010-03-03: M, I start to serve DURZ 2010-03-24: D, K, E start to serve DURZ 2010-04-14: B, H, C, G, F start to serve DURZ 2010-05-05: J starts to serve DURZ 2010-06-16: First Key Signing Key (KSK) Ceremony To come: 2010-07-12: Second Key Signing Key (KSK) Ceremony 2010-07-15: Distribution of validatable, production, signed root zone; publication of root zone trust anchor (Please note that this schedule is tentative and subject to change based on testing results or other unforeseen factors.)

1 0

Re: [swinog] swinog Digest, Vol 65, Issue 13
by shibu shibu 16 Jun '10

16 Jun '10

Check on VOl 45 issue 13 > From: swinog-request(a)lists.swinog.ch > Subject: swinog Digest, Vol 65, Issue 13 > To: swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:00:01 +0200 > > Send swinog mailing list submissions to > swinog(a)lists.swinog.ch > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > swinog-request(a)lists.swinog.ch > > You can reach the person managing the list at > swinog-owner(a)lists.swinog.ch > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of swinog digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: www.eda.admin.ch down? (Peter Keel) > 2. Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch (Klaus Ethgen) > 3. Re: Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch (Pim van Pelt) > 4. Re: Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch (Steven Glogger) > 5. Re: Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch (Beat Siegenthaler) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:01:04 +0200 > From: Peter Keel <seegras(a)discordia.ch> > Subject: Re: [swinog] www.eda.admin.ch down? > To: swinog(a)swinog.ch > Message-ID: <20100616050104.GB24418(a)discordia.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > * on the Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:11:30AM +0200, Linus Wegmann wrote: > > I understand now about the ICMP blocking... i guess it's because they > > wanna protect from DoS attacks (or other frauds).... > > Actually, it's because they don't understand IP. > http://www.phildev.net/mss/mss-talk.pdf > > Cheers > Seegras > -- > "Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve > neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin > "It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are > likely to end up with neither." -- Bruce Schneier > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:22:41 +0100 > From: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+swinog(a)ethgen.de> > Subject: [swinog] Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch > To: swinog(a)swinog.ch > Message-ID: <20100616082241.GA15276(a)tha.ethgen.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-action=pgp-signed > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > ich habe seit einiger Zeit auf allen meinen Nameservern Probleme, die > komplette Zone nic.ch zu resolven. Diese Probleme beschr?nken sich > ausschlie?lich auf nic.ch, mir ist keine andere Zone aufgefallen, die > Probleme macht. Vermutlich treten die Probleme seit September 2009, also > mit Umstellung auf DNSSec, auf. (Ich kann es leider nicht hundertprozent > genau datieren.) > > Nach einigen Debuggingschritten bin ich etwas ratlos. Meine Firewall > l??t in beiden F?llen (bei jeweils auch einem komplett anderen Provider) > alles durch, was Port 53 anbelangt. Auch ein Ausschalten der Firewall > bringt die selben ergebnisse. Auch ein Test mit verschiedenen anderen > DNSSec-Domainen, auch solchen, die gro? sind und somit fragmentiert > werden (sollten, meine MTU ist 1500), stellen keine Probleme dar. Ein > tcpdump zeigt aber recht schnell, da? von den UDP-Paketen von nic.ch > immer nur das erste ankommt und alle weiteren nicht auf meinem > Netzwerkinterface aufschlagen. > > Nun meine Frage: Hat oder hatte jemand von euch schon ?hnliche Probleme > und wie wurden sie behoben? Wenn es sich bei nic.ch um eine unwichtige > Domain handeln w?rde, w?re es mir ja egal, aber sie ist ja doch nicht > ganz so unwichtig. > > Gru? > Klaus Ethgen > - -- > Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.de/ > pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <Klaus(a)Ethgen.de> > Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEVAwUBTBiJ0Z+OKpjRpO3lAQKt6gf/W9+ftdXlrmK8jaW1zgGEhZvu0oOm/tpl > Wq+7u3GhlA08lIFSNeZxYQrs2Fea4rDVHQkxQvAHZogwvmIqNm7DemgnB1REKUD+ > gUI4OPtE29npnUdKEUUSLm/XsL8bSpbKX1ESTAx44uWegVS5LDHy+1lnjOfF29In > L91VUroTvfbu5Odm5/82sR7UrYMbJeR2X/3oEtONbFR8xXOW4Eguxx1eOszUS7DQ > BFN+AT6+A3g+ECn1WDCvrposYIC3YLu3V1qLSY5RzoDmuGxonbJv6zRCrTODp/9i > KATfUPQvvVdh6FFwc4WA7pSYZHmTnl6+YFWk7lIhU5F1pGBHbSiYtA== > =DVDj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:39:24 +0200 > From: Pim van Pelt <pim(a)ipng.nl> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Probleme mit Resolving nic.ch > To: Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+swinog(a)ethgen.de> > Cc: swinog(a)swinog.ch > Message-ID: > <AANLkTikU-QjIPhBYs7GAyaoyucMNamgajaXgAuF5p0zA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Does your firewall also allow egress tcp sessions on port 53? > Can you run tcpdump while trying to resolve? And what address(es) > specifically fail for you? >

1 0

www.eda.admin.ch down?
by Linus Wegmann 16 Jun '10

16 Jun '10

hi all since a while this evening i can't access www.eda.admin.ch anymore. (dmzwg1-003.eda.admin.ch) no reply of dmzwg1-003.eda.admin.ch (162.23.6.139) does anyone know about this issue? greets, Linus

4 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

swinog